Darling, Michael C, Luger, George F, Jones, Thomas B, Denman, Matthew R, Groth, Katrina M. Intelligent modeling for nuclear power plant accident management (Journal Article) International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 27 (2), pp. 1850003-1 – 1850003-25, 2018.

BibTeX

@article{Darling2018Intelligent,
title = {Intelligent modeling for nuclear power plant accident management},
author = {Michael C Darling and George F Luger and Thomas B Jones and Matthew R Denman and Katrina M Groth},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218213018500033},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-29},
journal = {International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
pages = {1850003-1 – 1850003-25},
keywords = {Counterfactual reasoning, decision support, dynamic Bayesian Networks},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Abstract

This paper explores the viability of using counterfactual reasoning for impact analyses when understanding and responding to “beyond-design-basis” nuclear power plant accidents. Currently, when a severe nuclear power plant accident occurs, plant operators rely on Severe Accident Management Guidelines. However, the current guidelines are limited in scope and depth: for certain types of accidents, plant operators would have to work to mitigate the damage with limited experience and guidance for the particular situation. We aim to fill the need for comprehensive accident support by using a dynamic Bayesian network to aid in the diagnosis of a nuclear reactor’s state and to analyze the impact of possible response measures.

The dynamic Bayesian network, DBN, offers an expressive representation of the components and relationships that make up a complex causal system. For this reason, and for its tractable reasoning, the DBN supports a functional model for the intricate operations of nuclear power plants. In this domain, it is also pertinent that a Bayesian network can be composed of both probabilistic and knowledge-based components. Though probabilities can be calculated from simulated models, the structure of the network, as well as the value of some parameters, must be assigned by human experts. Since dynamic Bayesian network-based systems are capable of running better-than-real-time situation analyses, they can support both current event and alternate scenario impact analyses.